On the Assets & Team step of the proposal wizard, each asset card carries chips that help you decide what to select. The evidence chip says which of the RFP's requirements the asset supports. The AI relevance chip says how closely the asset reads against the RFP as a whole.
The note above the list says the same: "Requirement evidence uses the same rule as the Go/No-Go analysis. AI relevance ranks how closely an asset reads against this RFP; it is a picking aid, not coverage."
Evidence chips
An asset's evidence chip reads one of these:
- "Evidence for 4 of 30 requirements": the asset supports 4 of the RFP's 30 requirements. For each requirement, Propivix names up to three assets whose wording best matches it, and this asset is one of them for 4 requirements.
- "Evidence for 4 of 30 requirements · 2 fully evidenced": for 2 of those requirements, this asset is what carries the requirement to Met. It covers enough of the requirement's most distinctive terms, or it holds the certification or clearance the requirement asks for.
- "No requirement evidence yet": the check ran, and this asset is not among the best matches for any requirement.
The rule is the same one the go/no-go analysis uses for its requirement coverage, run over the same assets, so the numbers on this step agree with the go/no-go page. See Requirement coverage for how Met, Gap and Unmet are decided.
Two things follow from sharing that rule:
- Evidence is measured against your whole library of CVs, project sheets, past proposals, certificates and boilerplate. Changing the business line on the Strategy step changes which assets are listed first, but not an asset's evidence figures.
- The figures are recalculated when the RFP's requirements change or when any of those assets is added, edited or removed.
What the chip does not mean: it is word matching between the asset and the requirement text, not a verified claim. It does not tell you that your proposal cites the asset or that the asset answers the requirement well. Read the asset before you rely on it.
Within each asset type, cards are sorted by evidence first: the asset that supports the most requirements comes first. AI relevance breaks ties.
AI relevance
The "AI relevance 72%" chip ranks how closely an asset reads against this RFP. It blends an AI or keyword reading of the asset against the requirements with how recently the asset was updated and its review and trust status. For a CV, once you select Run AI Match under AI Team Matching, the chip shows that CV's AI match score instead.
Use it as a picking aid. It is not coverage: a high AI relevance does not mean the asset supports any particular requirement, and it can be high for an asset with no requirement evidence. The chip is hidden when the score is zero or unknown.
The staffing scenarios that appear after team matching show a different number again, "% team coverage". That figure measures how much of the requirements the selected CVs can staff, not library evidence. See Team coverage.
Why an asset shows no evidence
An asset can read "No requirement evidence yet", or show no evidence chip at all. The reasons differ.
The chip reads "No requirement evidence yet" when the check ran but the asset's wording does not match any requirement well enough to be among its best three matches. To change it, make sure an asset that does support a requirement describes that work in the RFP's terms, or add one that does. The figures update the next time the assets are loaded.
There is no evidence chip at all, only AI relevance, when:
- The RFP has no extracted requirements. Check the RFP's compliance matrix, and see Re-analyzing an RFP if requirements are missing.
- The evidence check could not run this time. The rest of the step still works; reopen the wizard later to try again.
- The asset was added to the list from the rest of your library, beyond the matching results. The wizard lists those after the matched assets, and they carry AI relevance only.
Templates, assets of type other and call transcripts are never part of the check, so they never count as evidence for any requirement.
An asset with no evidence can still be the right choice, for example a CV you intend to propose for a key role. Evidence helps you pick; it does not decide for you.